Then I followed up with 9 weeks of posts on Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis, as well as a later series of weekly posts on Hilaire Belloc's The Great Heresies. Those books were all worthy of selections by a blog that makes attempting to answer the statement Why I Am Catholic as it's raison d'être.
Then a funny thing happened. I wrote a post on how I realized reading The Rule of St. Benedict was helping me be a better father. Next thing I know, Fr. Dwight Longenecker makes me an offer I couldn't refuse by sending me a free copy of his book, Listen My Son: St. Benedict for Fathers in return for reviewing it in this space. Since the Rule itself is so good, I figured Fr. Dwight could only make it better. So I happily agreed.
Some time passed and Eric Sammons, who blogs at The Divine Life asked me to do the same thing for him, and on the same terms. One free book (Who Is Jesus Christ?) in return for a review. I was happy for the opportunity to read his book, having read of his progress on his blog. Did you see his interview with Fr. Groeschel? It's "must-see TV." By the way, Eric? Get a haircut!
Right about now, the opportunist (or the skeptic) in you is thinking "free book = great review with Frank Weathers over at YIMCatholic. Let's send him something!"
Well that might not be a bad idea, as long as your work is faithful to the Magisterium. For the non-Catholics who may stumble upon this review today, that is a neat word that means "the teaching authority of the Church." If you would like a more in-depth discussion of this authority, head on over to the Catholic Encyclopedia.
TLC Book Tours made me the same offer that Fr. Dwight and Eric Sammons made me. They sent me a free copy of A View from the Back Pew: God, Religion, & Our Personal Quest for Truth in return for a review.
For all of the books I mentioned above, this was more than a fair trade. That's because I gained far more from reading all of those books than I paid for in the labor on writing the posts following their chapters, or on writing the reviews. Unfortunately, I can't say that in the case this time around.
The author, Tim O'Donnell, according to the back cover of the copy I was sent,
takes us on a powerful search for balance—between faith and personal experience, between the roots of Christianity and later layers of doctrine, and between systems of belief and a direct connection to the spiritual presence we call God.And so my labor began. The first 103 pages (out of a total of 280) drew me through Mr. O'Donnell's experiences growing up in Catholic schools, where it seems he had more interest in being a cut-up and class appointed pain in the rear (we have that in common, at least) than in actually learning about the faith. There were also some sophomoric school hi-jinks shared, an episode of running away from home, and Tim's year abroad to Rome while in college, all jammed into these first 100 pages.
Now, I'm not a product of Catholic schools, so his experience reads like another stereotype of mean nuns who wouldn't answer all of his questions about the faith to his satisfaction. No big deal though, because when you become an adult, and start questioning your faith, you'll be able to mine the vast resources available to you and answer these questions more to your satisfaction. Except that is not how it turns out for Mr. O'Donnell.
No. Instead, while in Rome, he has an experience that leads him to believe that organized religion is a waste of time. It doesn't happen all at once, but that is where it eventually leads. After all, God is so much bigger than the Church. And though I agree with that statement, the fact that Jesus started the Church and entrusted St. Peter and his successors with spreading the Gospel and building His Church up is relegated to not much more than being "perhaps the most powerful and wealthy private institution the world has ever known." Huh? Not much more than a country club for the elite? Sheesh!
On page 103 (Chapter 7) we learn of "the Deal." This is where Mr. O'Donnell describes the sure knowledge that he will be taken care of by God, made wealthy by Him, in exchange for him bringing the knowledge he has discovered about the true nature of God to the good folks like us. It goes something like this: "I will make you rich, while you're young, so you can retire early and spread this good news." Neat, huh? Sometimes while laboring through this book, I wasn't sure if I wasn't reading something written by the self-help guru Anthony Robbins.
To be charitable, Mr. O'Donnell has hit upon the importance of people needing to ask questions about their faith. But unfortunately, it doesn't appear to me that he went very much farther than his own opinion to find many of the answers. By page 113 of the book, I knew where this was heading. Throughout the book, the author makes a few references to the Catechism, and to a few passages from the Gospels. But not many. And not near enough to buttress his arguments.
Besides, by page 129 he is already "questioning" how the Trinity can be true. The Holy Spirit? Redundant. Later he questions why certain books were left out of the New Testament, like the Gnostic gospels that he quotes liberally later. The Kingdom of Heaven? Mr. O'Donnell has his own idea about that. The Our Father? Mr. O'Donnell show us the way we should really pray that prayer. And then the usual bromides about how the Church won't let women be priests, and how badly the Church treats women, how celibacy is a pretty bad idea, the difficulty in believing Mary was a virgin, or stayed a virgin, etc. It's pretty much the run-of-the mill list of "silly Catholic stuff" you've already read elsewhere. As for the Church being the "bulwark of Truth?" Fegettaboutit!
It took me but a short while to realize that I was reading the work of someone who, sadly, had dropped deeply into the pit of self-made ideas that are best described by one strong word: heresy. At this point, I was just glad I had read Belloc's The Great Heresies before being asked to review this book. Because although Mr. O'Donnell states that he "did not become a modern-day Gnostic, or anything like that," I can only say that it appears to me that he is exactly that. Read about the Albigensian Attack and you will understand what I encountered in Mr. O'Donnell's book.
And so ends my first book review in which I state flatly that this book should be avoided. And that isn't because Mr. O'Donnell questioned doctrines and found them wanting. It's because he questioned the doctrines and then failed to find the answers explaining them. As I was reading this book I kept thinking, where are the Church Fathers? Where are the writings of the Doctors of the Church? Wither the Saints? When he states that women are second-class citizens in the Catholic Church I wonder, where is St. Catherine of Siena, or St. Teresa of Avila, and The Little Flower?
One of Mr. O'Donnell's main arguments against the Church here is that she just doesn't change, or evolve. Which is ridiculous on it's face because of course she does! That is why Catholicism can't be "taken up in a tea cup," as the saint who wrote at length about her development stated so wisely.
The sad fact about this book is that by looking only inward, Mr. O'Donnell has missed so very much. The good news is, he still has a chance to find the rest of the forest if he applies himself to the task. My hope for him is that he climbs down from his own tree to do just that.